Yes, I get it. Women's sports are boring. Swimming in general is boring. I've been to women's swimming events; got more homework done than had I spent the same amount of time in the library. It's great.
But y'all should stop it. Stop sperging about how the trannyfreak issue has wreaked havoc in divorce disputes and schools and God knows where else. There's a reason the Venn diagram of 'who cares about women's sportz' and MGTOWs is a perfect circle. It's a complaint that takes negative social skills to publicly voice. While they may be right, nobody beeping cares. It's a phenomenon common across the lower echelons of the male SSH. But I digress.
The point is, in his greed for getting medals while being slow, Mr. William Thomas of U Penn handed what may well be millions of churchian, cuckservative, or downright liberal Americans a golden red pill opportunity. His generous gift is the logical implication of his athletic fraud. Let us run through it. What does it take to say that it's wrong for a grown man to hop into a pool full of women and pull the testosterone card on them?
First one, men and women have to be biologically different. Specifically, men have to be so much stronger and faster that women cannot be expected to compete against them. Else why bother with separate, protected women's sports? Just co-ed every sport and watch the massacres.
Second, these biological differences have to be unchangeable by the labcoats. If the labcoats can change this stuff, then William's infraction is maybe competing before his 'therapy' is complete. His public sin goes from abomination to technicality. Furthermore, if humans can't change this stuff, what does that point to in terms of our understanding of genetics? Is it possible that, hypothetically, man and woman He created them, and that there's sod-all we can do about it? You get the idea.
Third, women deserve the privacy of their locker room. Your search engine will reveal certain rumors about Mr. Thomas' conduct at Penn State. Consider keeping a bucket nearby when you do go look. But women can only deserve the privacy of their locker room if men and women are, again, biologically different, and if there are aspects of human sexuality that require regulation. Works doubly in those related to little girls. Do you want your daughters/granddaughters/nieces changing around a naked biological man with the associated hardware in full view? Ask yourself further if a certain book, compiled approximately 1500 years ago, could possibly have warned us about not controlling our bodily passions?
Those three are very basic implications. Stuff everyone can understand, even public intellectual figures. Use them tactfully. Yes, it's technically dialectic. But there's plenty of rhetoric to go around. Compliment Mr. Thomas' Adam's apple and his beer gut. Both are clearly visible on the publicly available video footage. And when your less based friends start asking the fun questions, be sure to thank Mr. William Thomas for setting off everyone's disgust reaction.
Thank you William Thomas
Edit: an earlier version said Penn State. Turns out Mr. Thomas swims for U Penn. S/O to Vinny for catching it
